Identity Theft and Company Responsibility

URL: Federal Agencies Issue Frequently Asked Questions on Identity Theft Rules

I believe that eventually companies will be held liable for identity thefts; particularly if the personal information was stolen from a company. A court, or jury, will eventually decide that a company has a duty to protect personal identity data, and failing to prevent the theft of that data is negligence.

So, how can a company protect itself? Follow the advice and recommendations of a federal agency. Incorporate these recommendation into your standard operating procedure. Enforce compliance and develop a quality/assurance test to ensure compliance.

Hershey Could Go To Jail Because It’s New Product Looks Like Cocaine

Earlier this week, Hershey released its new product, Ice Breakers Pacs, which are dissolvable pouches filled with powdered mint and sweetener, and are meant to dissolve on the tongue like breath strips. The pouches are blue or orange that, according to Family Court Judge Lori Dumas Brooks , looks uncannily like tiny heat-sealed bags of cocaine, crack, heroin or any other powdered drug. Jill Porter | Mint or drug: Is Hershey’s cracked? | Philadelphia Daily News | 11/30/2007

Did Hershey breaks any rules by packaging a product to look like an illegal controlled substance, even though the product is not an illegal drug? Yes, actually, it is a federal and state crime to distribute a substance labeled to resemble the likeness of a controlled substance. The statute calls this product a counterfeit controlled substance. See Section 780-102(b) of the Pennsylvania Statute.

Of course, the statute lists specific steps to proving whether Hershey intentionally packaged the product to look like the controlled substance, heroin or cocaine. For example, perhaps cocaine is only sold in colored, heat-sealed bags in Philadelphia, but is not sold in this manner across the state. The case is not open and shut. However, an interesting question is, how does a company go to jail? The chief executives responsible for the company’s actions go to jail on behalf of the company. So, if the state or the federal government were successful in proving that Hershey violated the Counterfeit Controlled Substance Act, then the chief executives could go the jail.

Is that the end of the story? No. For every criminal action, the victims of a crime can also sue the perpetrator in civil court for money damages. In this case, the victims of Hershey’s criminal actions are Hershey’s shareholders.

The shareholders of Hershey could bring a civil suit against the company for deliberately harming the corporation. This is a new legal trend; however, courts are beginning to recognize shareholders as creditors to compensate the shareholder for their losses. A suit such as this usually only lies when the company is insolvent; but it is only a matter of time before the courts recognize this cause of action, when the company mislead or deceived the shareholders. See Sons of Gwalia, Federal Court of Appeals 1305 (15 September 2005).

In addition, the shareholders could sue Hershey for not prosecuting the executives for wrongdoing. This is called a Shareholder Derivative Actions. The shareholders could also sue the company’s directors personally and directly for breach of fiduciary duty.

It will be interesting to watch this situation. Will the prosecutors investigate Hershey or will Hershey voluntarily discontinue the product?

What can you, as a business owner, learn from Hershey?

You must resist the urge to capture the lucrative illicit drug-using market by marketing a counterfeit-drug product. While you may sell many products, the revenue will not outweigh the costs.

Insurance ordered to pay Murderer for Victim’s funeral expenses

Insurance ordered to pay Murderer for Victim’s funeral expenses________________________________________ On November 12, 2007, the Pennsylvania Superior court ruled that McKernan, the insured, was entitled to reimbursement from Brethern Mutual Insurance, the insurer, for funeral expenses she paid as restitution as a part of her sentence when she was found guilty for killing her partner.

The Court found that the provision of her homeowner’s policy stating that the Insurance Company would pay for damages that McKernan was legally liable if a claim was made or a suit was brought against McKernan for damages because of bodily injury caused by an “occurrence”. As such, McKernan was entitled to reimbursement from Brethern for funeral expenses she paid because of a restitution award in a criminal action against her arising from her fatal stabbing of her former partner. The Court stressed that McKernan’s criminal convictions were for conduct that constituted an “occurrence” under the terms of the policy.

Brethern Mutual Insurance Company made a big mistake in failing to exclude from the definition of “occurrence” intentional torts, such as stabbing your partner to death. As a result, they have to pay McKernan for damages she caused by stabbing her partner. Insurance policies are contracts. The language in a contract binds a judge. Therefore, the judge had no choice but to force the insurance company to honor its promise to pay, even though they did not want to reimburse a murderer.

Brethern Mut. Ins. Co. v. McKernan, (Pa.Super.)

Do you have a legal question? We offer free consultations regarding this and others legal issues.  Call today or chat online, privately, with an attorney every Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. at www.mckeeoffice.com
 
 
Sharmil McKee
Business Lawyer
 
McKee Law Office
245 W. Allens Lane
Philadelphia, Pa 19119
215-242-5260 (office)
1-877-273-0749 (toll-free)
Skype Us! (mckee.law.offices)
http://www.mckeeoffice.com